Circumcised Vs Uncircumcised - The Medical Facts

Health Implications That Affect Circumcised and Uncircumcised Boys

© Gail Oliver

Jun 2, 2009
Circumcised Vs Uncircumcised Boys, sjs5769
The circumcision of newborn boys has been commonplace the past few decades, but many parents are now starting to reconsider whether it is the safer alternative.

Unless you are doing so for religious reasons, it is very difficult to understand if circumcising your newborn boy is the right thing to do. Circumcision, as well as the decision not to circumcise, both come with possible health implications, things to consider before you decide for your son.

Urinary Tract Infections

It is believed that by removing the foreskin it is easier to clean the penis and therefore less chance of getting a urinary tract infection. Research has shown that uncircumcised boys are 10 times more likely to get a urinary tract infection.

However, when you look closer at the numbers it is based on 1.1 percent of uncircumcised boys getting a UTI and .1 percent of circumcised boys, which are both very low percentages, and that is usually only in the first year of life. Adolescent men and adult men under 50 rarely have a UTI, regardless of whether they are circumcised or not.

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Researchers feel that circumcision lowers the risk of contracting and passing on sexually transmitted diseases. Research published in April 2009 by the South African Medical Research Council proved that adult male circumcision reduced the risk of men acquiring HIV infection from heterosexual sex by 51 to 60 percent. The belief is that circumcision helps to protect against HIV by removing cells in the foreskin to which the virus is specifically attracted.

Two other studies in 2008 and published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases suggest that circumcision may assist in the prevention of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, particularly infection with the high-risk subtypes that cause cervical, penile, and other cancers. A 2009 study in the New England Journal of Medicine also concluded that circumcision can significantly reduce the risk of acquiring human papillomavirus (HPV), as well as the herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), the cause of genital herpes.

Phimosis and Paraphimosis

There are two conditions only an uncircumcised boy can get. One is phimosis where the foreskin cannot retract because the opening is too narrow. For the majority of boys this is by the age of 5, but if by the age of 8 the foreskin is still not retractable, a doctor should be consulted. Chances of getting phimosis are about 5 percent. The second condition is paraphimosis where the foreskin retracts but cannot go back. This occurs mostly in children and elderly men. In both these cases, circumcision may be necessary.

Staph Infections and Hemorrhage

Circumcision is a surgical procedure and therefore not without possible complications. The two most common complications are bacterial sepsis (a bacterial infection in the bloodstream) and hemorrhage (where a baby loses more than 20 percent of its blood). These conditions occur in about 1 to 2% of all circumcisions.

Circumcised boys are also more subject to a form of bacterial sepsis, called Methicillin Resistant Staphyloccus Aureus (MRSA), after the surgery. This is a form of staph that is resistant to antibiotics and is a life threatening infection, especially for a young infant. When a baby boy is circumcised, there is always a chance that staph may enter through the open wound in his penis. Since staph is carried on a lot of people’s skin, the infant may contract it anywhere from the hospital nurse to his own parents once he leaves the hospital. A report in the April 2007 issue of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology showed that circumcised newborn boys were 12 times more likely to get MRSA.

A hemorrhage is defined as excessive bleeding. During the procedure if a blood vessel is cut, it can result in a hemorrhage. In some rare cases, a blood transfusion is needed as a result of a circumcision-related hemorrhage.

As you can see, circumcision is not an easy decision for a parent to make. If you do decide to circumcise, make sure you research the entire procedure and how to properly tend to your son afterward. If you do not circumcise, ensure your son understands the importance of good hygiene.

More Articles:


The copyright of the article Circumcised Vs Uncircumcised - The Medical Facts in Prenatal Health is owned by Gail Oliver. Permission to republish Circumcised Vs Uncircumcised - The Medical Facts in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.


Circumcised Vs Uncircumcised Boys, sjs5769
       


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo

Comments
Jun 2, 2009 9:50 PM
Guest :
Many doctors do not perform circumcisions on moral grounds

doctorsopposingcircumcision.org
Jun 3, 2009 12:18 AM
Guest :
I would encourage any parent contemplating circumcision to watch one being performed (or at least watch a video of one). My first son was circumcised because I just thought that's what was always done. He was sore for a while but he seemed okay after a week. Then I went to nursing school and saw circumcisions performed. Oh dear! When I observed the doctors doing it I asked them questions, like how it must be difficult to do but how they must feel good knowing they are helping the baby in the long run. Every doctor said there wasn't really a medical need to circumcise, just a cultural one for parents who want their son to match daddy. I even saw one baby who hemorrhaged during his circumcision, and that was at the hands of a very experienced doctor (the baby was fine in the end, but it was scary for a while).
Had I know what a circumcision really was, I never would have put my first born through all that. My second child was a girl but my third was another boy. I didn't dare have him circumcised. The nice thing was he was never fussy or sore like my first boy was. I worried they might wonder why they don't match in that way. That has never been an issue with them or with their dad. So while I don't feel comfortable telling parents not to ever circumcise, definitely do your research and watch one being done so you know what you and your baby are in for.

Lydia
Jun 3, 2009 6:29 PM
Guest :
Bravo for your dismissal of circumcision to prevent UTIs and penile cancer. Similar arguments apply to the STDs, and there is plenty of doubt about all the studies. 7/10 of the world's men have all their genitalia, and where socio-economics are similar, their penile health is just as good or better than the US.

It is quite wrong to say a non-retractible foreskin at 3 years old is "phimosis". It may not retract until puberty. There are other surgical and non-surgical alternatives to circumcision for true phimosis.

A couple of other issues parents ought to consider:

What are the functions of the foreskin? Would God/evolution have put it there - and left it there - to work as it does, without a sexual function?

And whose penis is it?
3 Comments